Shoring Up Services for Veterans, Energy Production and Cybersecurity Risks

3 min read

Shoring Up Services for Veterans, Energy Production and Cybersecurity RisksRelating to a national emergency declared by the President on March 13, 2020 (HJ Res 7) – On March 13, 2020, then-President Trump declared a national emergency relating to the COVID-19 pandemic. Since then, emergency status has continued until the passage of this resolution. The national emergency status relaxed many healthcare rules, such as training mandates for nursing home aides, easier access to certain prescribed medications (e.g., Adderall, Ritalin, oxycodone, buprenorphine), and utilization of uncredentialed nurse practitioners and physician assistants for hospitalized Medicare patients. The resolution to end emergency status passed in the House on Feb. 1 and Senate on March 29. The resolution was introduced by Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ) on Jan. 9 and enacted by President Biden on April 10.

Wounded Warrior Access Act (HR 1226) – This bill requires the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to respond to online requests by claimants for records related to VA claims and benefits. The VA must notify a requester within 10 days that their request has been received and fulfill the request within 120 days. The bill was introduced by Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-CA) on Feb. 28 and passed in the House on March 7. It currently resides in the Senate.

Veterans’ COLA Act of 2023 (S 777) – Effective Dec. 1, 2023, this bipartisan bill would increase the rates of compensation for veterans with service-connected disabilities as well as dependency and indemnity compensation for the survivors of certain disabled veterans. The bill was introduced on March 14 by Sen. Jon Tester (D-MT). It passed in the Senate on March 30 and is currently under consideration in the House.

Understanding Cybersecurity of Mobile Networks Act (HR 1123) – Introduced by Rep. Anna Ashoo (D-CA) on Feb. 21, this bill would require the National Telecommunications and Information Administration to report on the cybersecurity vulnerability of mobile service networks and mobile devices to cyberattacks and surveillance by adversaries. The bill was passed unanimously in the House on March 7; its fate currently resides in the Senate.

Lower Energy Costs Act (HR 1) – This bill is designed to reduce energy costs by increasing American energy production, exports, infrastructure, and critical minerals processing by implementing transparency, accountability, and permitting rules as well as improving water quality certification and expediting energy projects. The bill was introduced by Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA) on Jan. 26 and passed in the House on March 30. It is currently awaiting review in the Senate.

SECURE Notarization Act of 2023 (HR 1059) – This bipartisan legislation was introduced in the House by Rep. Kelly Armstrong (R-ND) on Feb. 17. It would permit notaries public to notarize electronic records and perform notarizations for remotely located individuals. The bill provides technical requirements, including creating and retaining video and audio recordings to conduct the transaction. Additionally, the bill would require all U.S. courts and states to recognize in-person and remoted notarizations affecting interstate commerce. The bill also allows a notary public to remotely notarize electronic records involving an individual located outside of the United States, subject to certain requirements. The bill passed in the House on Feb. 27 and is currently under consideration in the Senate.

Estate Taxes vs. Inheritance Taxes: Understanding the Differences

4 min read

Estate Taxes vs. Inheritance TaxesEstate and inheritance (“death”) taxes are levied on the transfer of property at death. The difference between an estate tax and an inheritance tax is based on who pays the bill. An estate tax is levied on the estate of the deceased, while an inheritance tax is levied on the heirs of the deceased. That’s the simple explanation. As for execution, there are far more nuances based on the monetary value of a bequest; the status of the beneficiary/(ies); and where you live when you pass away.

Federal Estate Tax

An estate tax applies to the value of the assets left behind by a decedent and is paid out from the proceeds of the estate before the rest of the assets are distributed to heirs. Estate wealth is usually comprised of cash, securities, and real estate.

In 2023, if an estate is valued at more than $12.92 million ($25.84 million for couples), the estate will owe a progressive tax rate levied on the value above that amount. For example, if an estate is valued at $15 million, it will pay estate taxes on the $2,080,000 above the exemption. The federal tax rate ranges from 18 percent to 40 percent, depending on the taxable value of the estate.

Generally, the estate tax applies to only the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans, and only 0.07 percent of estates end up paying the tax, according to the Tax Policy Center. Note that assets inherited by a spouse or charitable organizations are generally not subject to an estate tax.

Some states also levy an estate tax based on the location of the property. Presently, 12 states plus the District of Columbia levy an estate tax:

  • Connecticut
  • District of Columbia
  • Hawaii
  • Illinois
  • Maine
  • Maryland
  • Massachusetts
  • Minnesota
  • New York
  • Oregon
  • Rhode Island
  • Vermont
  • Washington

Estate Tax Strategies

To minimize or eliminate estate taxes, the estate owner has several options. Among the more sophisticated are structuring an Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust, a Family Limited Partnership or funding a Qualified Personal Residence Trust. However, the easiest way to legally avoid estate taxes is to give assets away before you die. Estate owners can make tax-deductible contributions to charitable organizations or gift up to $17,000 in 2023 ($16,000 in 2022) a year, per person, to as many people as you want.

Inheritance Tax

An inheritance tax, on the other hand, is a state tax paid by the beneficiary (heir) of an estate. Not every state levies an inheritance tax, and the laws vary considerably by state. The tax is based on the relationship of the beneficiary to the decedent. For example, in some instances, a beneficiary who is a surviving spouse, parent, child or grandchild may be exempt from the tax, whereas a brother, sister, niece or nephew may be subject to an inheritance tax.

Presently, six states levy an inheritance tax (only Maryland levies both estate and inheritance taxes). Each state sets its own exclusion amount, ranging from $1 million to $9.1 million. Amounts above the state exclusion are then subject to a separate estate tax, which tends to range between 1 percent and 18 percent. The tax applies to decedents who lived in one of these states:

  • Iowa (phasing out tax by 2025)
  • Kentucky
  • Maryland
  • Nebraska
  • New Jersey
  • Pennsylvania

Inheritance Tax Strategies

Similar to estate tax strategies, an estate owner can minimize state inheritance taxes by transferring assets to a trust or family limited partnership or by gifting assets. Be aware that assets owned under a Roth IRA or Roth 401(k) – that has been open for at least five years – are not subject to any taxes since contributions were already taxed and earnings grow tax-free. You also might consider using a portion of your assets to purchase life insurance, naming your heirs as beneficiaries. Since life insurance proceeds are not taxable, this is a way to remove money from the estate to create a larger, tax-free inheritance.

As for current estate assets, one surefire way to legally avoid inheritance taxes is to move to a state that doesn’t levy them.

What Is Web 3.0? Understanding The Next Generation of the Internet

4 min read

What Is Web 3.0? The internet keeps evolving. It started with static web pages in Web 1.0 before evolving to interactive and dynamic content in Web 2.0. A new phase of technology is now introducing Web 3.0, or the third generation of The World Wide Web. Although it is a work in progress, it is necessary to understand the new concept and how it will impact the future of online interactions.

What is Web 3.0?

Web 3.0 is a term used to describe the next generation of the internet. Industry experts consider it the next big thing in the evolution of the The Web after Web 2.0. Web 2.0 refers to the Internet era characterized by user-generated content, social networking, and interactive web applications; it is known mainly as the Internet of Information.

Web 3.0, on the other hand, is built on top of the existing infrastructure; however, it introduces new technologies that enable computers to interpret data in a more human-centered manner. It combines disruptive technologies such as blockchain, augmented reality, virtual reality, edge computing, IoT, etc. As a result, the internet will become a more intelligent and efficient tool for finding and processing information.

Web 3.0 is also referred to as the semantic web or decentralized web and aims to create a more meaningful online experience by integrating artificial intelligence (AI), decentralized networks, and semantic understanding.

Key Features of Web 3.0

Decentralization

Web 3.0 makes good the move toward decentralization. Decentralization implies that instead of relying on central authorities, data is simultaneously stored in multiple locations. Since Web 3.0 is built on decentralized networks, such as blockchain technology, it creates a more transparent, secure, and trusted web and gives users more control over their data.

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Web 3.0 will enable computers to comprehend information similar to the way humans do, using semantic web concepts and natural language processing. It also will utilize machine learning – technology that employs data and algorithms to imitate human learning and enhance accuracy. Web 3.0 is designed to leverage the power of artificial intelligence (AI), making web applications more intelligent and enhancing their capacity to make informed decisions. It also helps automate tasks, improve efficiency, and provide more personalized experiences for users.

Ubiquity and Connectivity

The rise of the Internet of Things (IoT) is another contributing factor, enabling information and content to be more connected and ubiquitous. It also means data is accessible via multiple applications and devices.

3D Visualization

Using augmented reality, virtual reality, and mixed reality combined with technologies such as IoT makes it possible to create a spatial web. This helps maintain real-life scale and experience on the web. A good example is the application of VR technology in e-commerce.

Openness and Accessibility

Web 3.0 is built on open standards and protocols, which make it more accessible to both developers and users. This promotes innovation and collaboration across different sectors and communities.

The Impact of Web 3.0 and Challenges

Web 3.0 will significantly change how users interact with information online and transform different aspects of life, including commerce, health, and education, among others. For instance, decentralization gives users greater control over their personal data. This might help limit the collection of data without user consent or compensation.

With blockchain technology as a foundation of Web 3.0, the data becomes immutable, transparent, and hard to hack. This is because all transactions will use self-executing smart contracts.

Web 3.0 will usher in a new era of automation as intelligent systems and algorithms become increasingly integrated into online experiences. This will include more intelligent chatbots, personalized recommendations, sophisticated predictive analytics, and autonomous systems.

As a result, there will be an improved user experience. Users will have a more personalized and interactive experience online, with applications that can better understand their needs and preferences.

Despite the impressive positive impact, Web 3.0 is still in its early emerging stage and is not without challenges. As more significant work and effort are being put toward its actualization, several issues must be addressed. First, to facilitate specific user functions, additional layers must be built on top of the blockchain to ease its complex operations.

Secondly, decentralization introduces data governance and regulation concerns. With no central control of data, bad actors can take advantage to promote hate speech, misinformation and cybercrime.

Thirdly, this new iteration of the internet also requires implementing new technologies and using advanced devices.

Conclusion

The evolution of the internet is inevitable. Although more effort is still required to realize the full potential of Web 3.0, business leaders should be aware of new developments to ensure they can take advantage of opportunities presented by the spatial web and venture into new avenues to remain competitive.

I Needed to Repay Part of My Compensation; Will I Get a Refund on My Taxes?

3 min read

Repay Part of My Compensation, Refund on My Taxes?So, you filed and paid all your taxes on the money you earned in 2021. Now, the company you work for finds itself in trouble, and you are forced to pay back part of your compensation. The big question is, will the IRS refund you for the taxes you already paid related to this compensation? While this seems like a bizarre scenario at first glance, it is more common than you might think.

Reducing or holding back compensation that hasn’t been earned yet is easy. Simply pay an executive or employee less, or don’t grant the stock option or bonus. Just don’t pay it.

Things get tricky in a situation where compensation has already been paid and needs to be reversed. This is much, much tougher. If you are still within the same calendar year, then logistically, it’s easier to make an adjustment; but unwinding compensation already awarded is never simple or easy.

Requiring an employee to pay back compensation is not as uncommon as many think. The situation can be as simple as receiving a signing bonus with the stipulation to stay at least a year. IRS treatment of repaid compensation depends on the details.

Details on Compensation Clawbacks

The answer to the core question can vary, with the legal context and timing being the biggest drivers. For example, both Dodd-Frank and the Consumer Protection Act grant regulatory authority to mandate clawbacks, even in cases where the taxpayer was unaware of any wrongdoing. The Sarbanes-Oxlet Act has its own set of clawback regulations. In cases such as this, there is the possibility, due to legal concerns, that a refund is not due to the taxpayer.

Generally, in cases of contractual issues, the IRS doesn’t allow a taxpayer to undo an economic event as if it never happened. The general exception to this rule is if you receive and give back the same compensation within the same calendar year. The problem, however, is that clawbacks usually come in later years after a tax return has been filed.

If you are still employed at the same company, they could simply agree to reduce your current year salary. If you are a former employee, things get tricker. You also have the possibility of amending a prior tax return in some cases. Unfortunately, many people find themselves in a situation where they need to claim a tax refund under Section 1341 of the tax code.

Section 1341 is based on the claim of right doctrine and attempts to put a taxpayer in the same position he or she would have been in had they never received the income. To qualify for and file under this provision, the taxpayer must have included money in income in the prior year because they had an unrestricted right to it at that time and then later learned they did not have an unrestricted right to it after all, therefore having to give it back.

Conclusion

The rules and regulations around the taxability of compensation required to be repaid is not simple. While the core issue of whether one is voluntary or mandatory, givebacks almost always create tax problems. If you ever find yourself in a situation where you have to return a material amount of compensation, no matter what the source, it’s best to reach out to your trusted tax adviser for help navigating the complexities.

How to Look at Liquidity through an Accounting Lens

3 min read

Liquidity, Accounting LiquidityLiquidity refers to a business’s ability to convert its short-term assets or securities into cash quickly to meet its short-term financial obligations or pay bills due within the next 12 months. Naturally, cash is the most liquid. This is different than solvency, which refers to the ability of a business to satisfy its long-term bills.

It’s important to distinguish between market liquidity and accounting liquidity. Market liquidity implies how a nation’s stock market or real estate market functions, specifically if there are enough buyers and sellers. The closer the bid and ask prices are, the greater the level of liquidity that exists. The greater the liquidity, the easier it is for participants to transact.

Determining the liquidity of a business helps investors see how a company balances its cash. This demonstrates how well a company manages its ability to pay bills versus being able to direct money for retained earnings, dividends, reinvesting in its business, or for acquisitions. When it comes to measuring liquidity, there are three ratios that estimate how liquid a business is: current, quick, and cash ratios.

Current Ratio

This compares current assets to current liabilities. It’s expressed as follows:

Current Ratio = Current Assets / Current Liabilities  = $20,000 / $5,000 = 4

This means for every $1 in outstanding bills, the company has $4 in cash available to satisfy those debts. While each industry has a unique target ratio, a range of 1.5 to 2.5 is seen as a healthy measure.

Quick Ratio (Acid-Test Ratio)

This calculation removes inventories and some short-term assets that are more illiquid than incoming payments expected to be paid within a reasonable short-term time frame, such as accounts receivable. It’s expressed as:

Quick Ratio = (Cash and Cash Equivalents + Short-Term Investments + Accounts Receivable) / Current Liabilities   

If the resulting number is less than 1, this could indicate the business is facing an inability to pay its short-term bills.

Cash Ratio

This looks at how well a company can pay off short-term debt with its cash and similar financial assets that can be converted to cash instantaneously. It’s expressed as follows:

Cash Ratio = Cash and Cash Equivalents / Current Liabilities = $10,000 / $3,000 = 3.33

With a 3.33 ratio, this example shows the company is in good shape liquidity-wise. A general reference of at least 0.5 (but higher shows better financial health) is recommended.

Interpreting Results

Once the results are calculated, businesses can analyze their findings and see the financial position of their company. For example, if they are looking for financing, lenders take into account these ratios to determine a level of confidence in debt repayment. If a company is looking for investors, savvy investors can determine how competitive the company is against its industry/sector competitors.

Internal Company Reflection

Depending on the company’s circumstances, changes might need to be implemented immediately and over the long term. A business may need to look at operating costs to cut costs. Cash flow projections are recommended to see how the company is doing on its restructuring and cost-cutting efforts.

When it comes to managing liquidity, using these ratios along with short- and long-term planning to improve a company’s financial and liquidity position can make a business more attractive to lenders and investors and more resistant to economic downturns.

How Volunteering Can Earn You a Big Tax Deduction

4 min read

Volunteering Tax DeductionMost people volunteer out of a sense of altruism, duty or purpose – not to get a tax deduction from Uncle Sam. At the same time, if your good deeds could also result in lower taxes, why not? Theoretically, this would free up more time to volunteer or let you make a charitable donation, a win-win for you and the cause you care about.

What Volunteering Expenses Can You Deduct?

As with all tax rules and regulations, the devil is in the details. If you itemize your tax deductions, you might be eligible for some valuable deductions. Any expenses deducted must directly relate to the charity where you volunteer, and you can’t have been reimbursed for them. Lastly, you will need to be taking the itemized deductions and not the standard deduction.

Below, we will look at the specifics of what you can and cannot deduct.

Time Spent Volunteering

Unfortunately, not. Regardless of how much time you spend volunteering, those hours have no economic value in terms of a tax deduction. Now, you may be saying: My time when I serve a client is billed out at $250 per hour. No matter, in this case, the IRS simply does not care. When it comes to donating your time as a volunteer, the only thing you get in return is a warm fuzzy feeling for doing a good thing.

Volunteering Expenses

Often, organizations ask volunteers to provide their own supplies and materials to carry out the work. Think of things like office supplies, for example. In other cases, volunteers will need to provide their own safety gear or a special uniform. All these types of expenses are deductible if you are paying for them out of your pocket and not getting reimbursed.

Cost of Commuting

Driving your own car as part of your volunteer work also can yield a charitable deduction. Under section 170, the IRS provides a standard rate of $0.14 per mile driven in 2022 and 2023. Alternatively, you can deduct the actual costs of fuel (i.e., gas or diesel) and tolls. Once again, it is deductible only if you are not reimbursed for the expenses.

Travel Expenses

Travel expenses related to volunteering also can be deductible. To qualify, the expenses must be directly related to the volunteer work; not have been reimbursed; and be reasonable. The definition of reasonable is of course open to interpretation and relative depending on the circumstances; however, taking a private plane or flying first class is unreasonable in the eyes of the IRS.

You also can deduct the cost of meals needed while volunteering at the full cost (100 percent). The 50 percent business limitations do not apply.

Fundraising Costs

Hosting a fundraising event can cost big bucks. For individuals generous enough to host such an event, it is completely legitimate to deduct your unreimbursed expenses for putting on the event.

Recordkeeping

Like any tax deduction for personal or business reasons, keeping good records is key. Keep track of mileage with a daily logbook, keep receipts, and note what, where, when, who, and why for each volunteer-related expense. This applies to any of the items above, from simple mileage to hosting an entire fundraising event.

Conclusion

Volunteering is a great way to give back to your community or a cause you care about. It also can be a source of additional tax deductions, which will put more money in your pocket to spend or use for charitable purposes as you see fit. If volunteering is part of you and your family’s life, consider the guidelines outlined above and talk to your tax professional about your individual situation.

The Importance of Global Collaboration in Regulating Emerging Technologies

4 min read

Regulating AIEmerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, data analytics, and biotechnology, greatly transform society and reshape the global economy. However, these technologies also come with a significant challenge regarding ethical and social implications. Global collaboration by governments, regulators, and industry leaders can help ensure that emerging technologies are developed and deployed responsibly.

Challenges of Regulating Emerging Technologies

Emerging technologies have led to complex situations that traditional governments might find difficult to manage. For instance, today’s advanced technologies also come with new forms of crime. This requires law enforcement and public safety organizations to keep up with new and innovative crimes. Today’s governments face challenges that affect the development of effective digital laws.

One of these challenges is the independence of technology from physical state territories. The interconnection of technology devices over the internet has no boundaries. This makes it impossible for any country to regulate all aspects of the technologies. Secondly, all states are not the same, and each enhances its technology-related laws according to its capabilities. While strong economies can afford robust IT infrastructure, other countries do not have the technical capacity.

Other factors that complicate technology regulation include the ability of major technology companies to bypass established regulations. Additionally, states are consumers of technology products and services developed by private corporations. Since they are not innovators, policymakers, and regulators, they do not understand the intricate technology systems that affect the regulatory decisions that must be made.

The above-mentioned are only a few of the challenges that make technology regulation complicated. Still, there is a growing need for digital governance and a digital constitution.

Why Global Collaboration is Crucial in Regulating Emerging Technologies

  1. Address ethical and social issues – significant ethical and societal issues, like data privacy and security, are brought up by emerging technology. However, international cooperation can help ensure coordinated and efficient responses to these issues.
  2. Growing competition for technological dominance – political, societal, and economic rivalries are driving technological dominance. Increased competition for elements of technology supremacy can only result in conflict, obstructing technology’s ethical use.
  3. Technology diffusing globally – in most cases, new technologies are available for adoption anywhere in the world. Thus, international regulatory frameworks must be coordinated to prevent competing or incompatible laws.
  4. Harmonizing standards – global cooperation can assist in harmonizing standards and laws for new technology, making it simpler for businesses to comply and lowering entry barriers for new players.
  5. Promote inclusivity – emerging technologies have the potential to make existing social and economic inequalities even worse. Collaboration on a global scale can ensure that these technologies are usable by everyone and do not reinforce or introduce new forms of exclusion.
  6. Enhance innovation – collaboration across borders can facilitate the exchange of knowledge, ideas, and best practices, leading to more innovation and faster technological advancement.
  7. Avoid existential risks – technology can potentially introduce threats that endanger life globally. Such risks might include nanotechnology weapons and engineered pandemics. However, developing strategic global legal frameworks that identify potential risks can help avoid the proliferation of dangerous and harmful technologies.

Existing Efforts for Global Collaboration in Regulating Emerging Technologies

There are numerous initiatives for international cooperation in regulating emerging technologies. For example, the Global Partnership on Artificial Intelligence (GPAI) brings together governments and business executives from across the world. Its goal is to ensure artificial intelligence (AI) is developed and deployed responsibly in a human-centric manner. GPAI’s main focus is on responsible AI, data governance, the future of work, and innovation and commercialization.  

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) is another international organization where governments work together to solve common challenges and develop global standards. A good example is their recommendation on responsible innovation in neurotechnology, adopted by the OECD Council in December 2019. Other organizations working toward promoting global collaboration and coordination on emerging technology issues include the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the United Nations.

Unfortunately, there is still a lot of work to be done. Continued global cooperation is crucial to ensure that emerging technologies are created and used to benefit society. Currently, there is no global agreement on technology regulation; instead, regulators take different and sometimes conflicting standpoints.

Conclusion

The pace and impact of emerging technologies are likely to keep increasing. Although these developments improve human experiences, the potential for these technologies to disrupt social, economic, and political systems worldwide means that it is essential for governments, private companies, and civil organizations to work together to ensure that they are developed responsibly.

Transparency for the Coronavirus, Federal Settlements, Smart Appliances and Public Education

4 min read

Transparency for the Coronavirus, Federal Settlements, Smart Appliances and Public EducationCOVID-19 Origin Act of 2023 (S 619) – This bill would authorize the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) to declassify all information relating to the origin of COVID-19 and any correlation with the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The ODNI would be required to redact the report as necessary to protect sources and methods and then submit it to Congress. The bill was introduced on March 1 by Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO). It passed the Senate on the same day and the House on March 10. It is currently awaiting signature by the president.

Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in approving the Revised Criminal Code Act of 2022 (HJ Res 26) – This resolution nullifies the Revised Criminal Code Act of 2022, which had previously been enacted by the Council of the District of Columbia (DC). The bill modified DC criminal laws by altering sentencing guidelines, reducing maximum penalties, and expanding the right to a jury trial for certain misdemeanor crimes. The resolution was introduced by Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-GA) on Feb. 2. It passed in the House and Senate on March 8 and was enacted by the president on March 20.

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to “Prudence and Loyalty in Selecting Plan Investments and Exercising Shareholder Rights” (HJ Res 30) – This resolution was introduced by Rep. Andy Barr (R-KY) on Feb. 7. In December 2022, the Department of Labor established a rule that the fiduciaries of employer-sponsored retirement and other investment benefit plans might take into account environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors of companies where they choose to invest shareholder funds, as well as voting on shareholder resolutions and board nominations. This joint resolution, which was passed in both the House and the Senate on March 1, would nullify that rule. The bill was vetoed by President Biden on March 20.

Settlement Agreement Information Database Act (HR 300) – Introduced by Rep. Judy Chu (D-CA) on Jan. 20, this bipartisan bill would require agencies to submit information related to any settlement or consent decree associated with a violation of civil or criminal law. This includes settlements with individual employees who appeal adverse personnel actions such as firings and suspensions or federal settlement agreements negotiated behind closed doors as a result of enforcement actions. The Office of Management and Budget would be responsible for reviewing and archiving all agreements, as well as determining when confidentiality is necessary to protect the public interest of the United States. The bill was passed unanimously in the House on Jan. 25. Its fate currently resides in the Senate.

Fighting Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Act of 2023 (S 645) – This bill would require the Attorney General to devise a program for making treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder and acute stress disorder available to public safety officers. The bill was introduced on March 2 by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IO). It passed in the Senate on March 2 and is currently under consideration in the House.

Informing Consumers about Smart Devices Act (HR 538) – The passage of this bill would require manufacturers of internet-connected devices, such as smart appliances, which include a camera or microphone, to disclose this fact to consumers. The bill does not apply to devices that a consumer would reasonably expect to include these features (e.g., mobile phones, laptops). The bill was introduced by Rep. John Curtis (R-UT) on Jan. 26 and passed in the House on Feb. 27. It is currently awaiting review in the Senate.

Sunshine Protection Act of 2023 (S 582) – This bipartisan bill would make daylight savings time permanent. It was introduced on March 1 by Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) but has yet to be assigned to a committee for review.

Parents Bill of Rights Act (HR 5) – This legislation was introduced in the House by Rep. Julie Letlow (R-LA) on March 1 with 122 Republican co-sponsors. It would require public schools to allow parents to review certain materials and resources (e.g., the curriculum, library books, teachers’ materials used in the classroom) and be informed/grant consent for certain school activities (e.g., school budgets, use of technology in the classroom, attendance for guest speakers in the classroom, mental health treatment, gifted and talented programs). The House Committee on Education and the Workforce have issued a report on the bill, but it has yet to be presented for a vote by House members.

How Blockchain Could Impact Accounting and Auditing

3 min read

How Blockchain Could Impact Accounting and AuditingBlockchain has the promise to revolutionize the way businesses and their accountants keep track of their financial records. When it comes to audit evidence, blockchain may be able to give organizations more efficient ways to bring financial data into universal conformity; help businesses present relevant financial data in an open manner; and interpret and select data effectively. Blockchain is a digitally distributed ledger that captures transactions conducted among parties within a network. It’s a peer-to-peer, internet-based archive that records all transactions since its creation and maintains proof of these transactions.

Each participant is a node on the mutual database connected to the blockchain, with every user maintaining an identical copy of the ledger. Each entry is a transaction that represents an exchange of value between participants. Along with featuring near real-time transaction settlement, which speeds up payment completion between parties, properly designed blockchains create unchangeable transaction records. This can help auditors investigate transactions as they occur in real-time.

And as blockchain is adopted more and more, auditors will be able to obtain data from the blockchain; however, it’s important to view it all with a skeptical eye. Transactions may be fraudulent or prone to error. Viewers must be even more skeptical if the blockchain is controlled by an entity other than the entity being audited.

Using Bitcoin as an example, the transfer of assets is recorded on the blockchain. Accountants can use blockchain to look at transactions one by one. However, instead of focusing on bookkeeping tasks, for example, accountants’ roles are expected to evolve into higher-level tasks requiring more judgment. As blockchain adoption increases, responsibilities like bookkeeping and reconciliation will require less of an accountant’s time, permitting them to work on more analytical tasks like transaction classification and valuations.

Determining depreciation and the resulting salvage value of an asset when its useful life is exhausted is one example of a transaction that might need some investigating by an auditor.

The Internal Revenue Service mandates businesses judge a fair salvage value, but it’s just that – an estimate. Based on the asset’s usage and expected service time frame, the equipment could have scrap value contingent on metal content or technology that might become obsolete, rendering it of little to no value. Since it’s so subjective, this can impact a company’s accounting and resulting profitability and income tax obligations, requiring careful judgment.

If the salvage value is determined to be too high, it will reduce the depreciation for the business. If it’s too low, depreciation would be factored in too much, and the company’s net earnings will be less than expected. As part of determining the salvage value, businesses and those who audit a business’ financial statements need to exercise judgment when looking into transactions, whether it’s on the blockchain or another type of ledger.

As blockchain evolves, businesses that take advantage of this technology can leverage its efficiencies to reduce the need for rote work and focus on the substance of accurately reporting transactions and not the rudimentary movement of data between parties.

Different Ways to Value a Business

4 min read

Different Ways to Value a Business, Business ValuationWhen it comes to valuing a business, there are many ways to examine a company’s profitability. Looking at a business’ liquidation value and its breakup value are two of many approaches to see how a company is functioning and how it might run under different management and economic environments.

Liquidation Value

This type of valuation can be defined as the difference between what tangible assets would sell for at auction minus outstanding liabilities. Typically, intangible assets are not considered in this type of valuation. However, if the intangibles along with the physical assets, are considered for sale and not sold at auction, it would be considered a business’ “going-concern value.” Examples of intangibles include goodwill, brand recognition, patents, etc.

There are many considerations when exploring liquidation value. Generally speaking, the liquidation value is more than the salvage value but less than the book value. When a company is going out of business and assets are auctioned off, proceeds will normally be valued below the asset’s historical cost. Historical cost refers to how assets are reported on the balance sheet. However, if the market assesses assets lower in value compared to business use, it could be lower than book value.

Here is an example of how liquidation value can be calculated. Say a business has liabilities of $1.1 million. Based on the balance sheet, the book (or historical) value of assets is $2 million; and assets have a salvage value of $100,000. If the value of selling the business’ assets via auction is projected to be $0.80 per dollar, it could be expressed as follows:

$1.6 million (assets sold at auction at $0.80 per dollar) – $1.1 million (liabilities) = $500,000 (Liquidation Value)

Breakup Value

Also known as “the sum-of-parts value,” the breakup value determines the worth of a corporation’s individual segments if they were operating independently. Investors might pressure the company to spin off one or more segments into a separate publicly traded company to maximize its value.  

For each operating unit, the first step involves determining the segment’s cash flow, revenue, and earnings. Such valuations can be benchmarked to publicly traded industry peers to determine comparative value of the business segment in question.

Financial ratios, including price-to-earnings (P/E) or price-to-free cash flow, are examples of starting points that analysts use to compare segmented business lines to industry peers to determine if it’s trading at below fair value, fair value or above fair value.

For example, if the P/E ratio of the company being analyzed is lower than its peers, it could mean the company is cheaper or trading below fair value on an earnings basis. Though a more thorough financial analysis and assessment of macroeconomics is recommended, such as interest rates, inflation, etc., analysts could make an educated projection on how future earnings may or may not hold up in the future, compared to the business segment’s snapshot valuation.

Another way to evaluate is via discounted cash flows (DCF). This shows the segment’s future free cash flow projections through a discount rate, generally the weighted average cost of capital (WACC). The formula arrives at the present value of the business segment’s future cash flows. The following DCF example can tell the expected profitability and how to treat it going forward as part of the business:

Assume the company’s WACC is 10 percent; the amount invested is $5 million; it will last three years, and the annual estimated cash flows are as follows:

Cash Flow                Discounted Cash Flow

Year 1: $2 million       $1,818,181.82

Year 2: $4 million       $3,305,785.12

Year 3: $6 million       $4,507,888.81

Compared to the amount invested of $5 million for the business’ selected business segment, the discounted cash flows for the project are $9,631.855.75. This could give an indication of how the business line might do if it’s spun off or how its performance will impact other lines of the business financially.

While valuation is subjective, especially in periods of volatile inflation and interest rate conditions, the more points of valuation analysis that occur, the better the chances that valuations will turn out to be correct.