Author: Service2Client

What to Expect from U.S. Tax Policy in 2026

4 min read

What to Expect from U.S. Tax Policy in 2026After a whirlwind 2025 that produced what may be the largest tax bill in American history, the coming year looks dramatically different. Tax policy experts are predicting a legislative standstill, a turbulent tax filing season, and lingering questions about how new provisions will work when put into practice.

A Year of Legislative Gridlock

The forecast for 2026 tax legislation is bleak. With Republicans clinging to an impossibly thin House majority of just 218 or 219 seats following recent resignations, passing any significant bills will be extraordinarily difficult. Every single Republican vote would be needed to advance legislation through reconciliation, and as 2025 demonstrated, keeping the caucus unified is no small feat.

While there has been discussion about a potential second reconciliation bill, most observers view this as wishful thinking. If such a bill were to materialize, it would likely focus on technical corrections to lingering Tax Cuts and Jobs Act issues and problems that emerged from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. One notable concern involves accelerated research credits that did not deliver the benefits lawmakers intended because of unexpected interactions with the corporate alternative minimum tax.

The more pressing concern will simply be keeping the government running. A January deadline looms to avoid another shutdown and, given the contentious relationship between House Republicans and Democrats throughout 2025, even basic funding bills face uncertain prospects. With midterm elections consuming attention in the second half of the year, legislative bandwidth for tax policy will be virtually nonexistent.

A Rough Road Ahead for Taxpayers

The 2026 tax filing season is shaping up to be challenging. The IRS has experienced unprecedented upheaval, losing somewhere between 20 percent and 25 percent of its workforce through a combination of voluntary resignations and reductions in force. Many of these departures came from enforcement divisions, though customer service will also feel the impact.

Leadership instability has compounded these problems. The agency cycled through roughly seven commissioners or acting commissioners in 2025 alone. Former Congressman Billy Long was confirmed as commissioner but lasted less than two months before departing under unclear circumstances. The Treasury Secretary has since taken direct oversight of the agency, and an IRS CEO position was created for the first time in the agency’s history. No new commissioner nominee has been put forward, and there is currently no Senate-confirmed chief counsel either.

For taxpayers who need more than basic return processing, this means longer wait times, fewer answered phone calls, and potential delays. Those filing straightforward W-2 returns seeking refunds will likely fare better than individuals or businesses with complicated situations requiring IRS assistance. Audit rates will decline intentionally, as the current administration has committed to scaling back the enforcement emphasis of the Biden years.

The Justice Department’s Tax Division also has been gutted, losing many qualified litigators who previously maintained an exceptional track record against large taxpayers in court. This erosion of enforcement capability may not immediately move voluntary compliance numbers, but continued cuts will eventually catch up with the system.

Unresolved International Questions

The relationship between U.S. tax policy and the global minimum tax framework under Pillar 2 remains unsettled. Republicans declined to include a retaliatory tax provision known as section 899 in last year’s legislation based on an agreement with G20 nations. If that agreement unravels, there may be pressure to revisit retaliatory measures, though passing such legislation with current House margins seems unlikely.

American companies operating internationally could face pressure in foreign jurisdictions if the United States fails to align with Pillar 2 requirements. While many in Washington believe the international minimum tax framework will collapse, the reality on the ground suggests otherwise, and this disconnect might force future legislative action.

Conclusion

The bottom line for 2026: expect a holding pattern on major tax legislation and brace for a difficult filing season as an understaffed and unsettled IRS works to implement last year’s massive changes.

Understanding the Equity Multiplier

3 min read

What is Equity MultiplierWhether you are an investor, an owner, or an internal financial analyst, understanding how the equity multiplier works and how to interpret it is a helpful skill.

Defining the Equity Multiplier

The equity multiplier is a metric that tells the user what percentage of the company’s assets are loaned against shareholders’ equity. The smaller the calculated number for the equity multiplier, the less risky the financing is due to less debt owed by the company. It’s more favorable since there are lower debt servicing costs needed. When liabilities and/or assets change, the company’s equity multiplier changes.

Conversely, the bigger the equity multiplier, the more likely investors will be exposed to financial risk. This is due to the company having more outstanding debt, requiring more cash flows to service ongoing debt repayment, along with normal operations. A good rule of thumb is that anything lower than 2 is good, while anything higher than 2 signifies risk.

Putting It into Context

Since companies obtain financing through a mix of equity, debt, or both, it’s important to measure and monitor how the combination changes over time. Since investors look at the metric, among other financial yardsticks, it can influence how they determine if a company is worth investing in. Investors compare one company to others in the same industry and against historical measures to see how the company rates financially. The equity multiplier is measured relative to past measures, industry standards, or its sector competitors.

The ratio is calculated as follows:

Equity Multiplier = Total Assets / Total Shareholders’ Equity

Both input values are found on the company’s balance sheet, either on the quarterly or annual reports filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

If a company wants to go public, it can calculate this ratio to determine if its present results are robust for lenders’ review. Say a company has $2 million in total assets and $1.25 million in shareholders’ equity. Based on these numbers, it’s calculated as follows:

= $2,000,000 / $1,250,000 = 1.6  

The equity multiplier in this scenario, which shows a moderate amount of borrowing, may or may not pose an issue for the company’s financial health.

If a business’ total assets are $450 billion, and shareholders’ equity, according to the financial statements, was $150 billion, the company’s ratio is 3X ($450 / $150).

If a different company’s assets are $825 billion with $165 billion of shareholders’ equity, the same resulting ratio is 5X ($825 / $165).

These calculations show that as the ratio of liabilities and asset values adjusts, the equity multiplier also changes because a company uses less debt and more shareholders’ equity to finance the assets. While higher equity multipliers can help companies grow faster, especially during low interest rate and high-growth environments, if borrowing costs rise and/or sales fall dramatically, it can forecast negative growth. Investors favor businesses with low equity multipliers since this indicates the company is using more equity and less debt to finance the purchase of assets.

Regardless of the company or the industry, understanding how the ratio is calculated and used in making investment decisions makes sense for both companies and their potential investors.

5 Private Equity Predictions for 2026

3 min read

5 Private Equity Predictions for 2026For private equity investors, 2026 is going to be a good year. Financing conditions are stabilizing, interest rates are decreasing, and valuations are beginning to reset. Further, these firms are moving to growth-at-any-cost strategies, deeper diligence, and more disciplined risk underwriting. Here’s a high-level look at a few things you can expect.

PE firms thrive despite policy and market uncertainty. Driven by shifting tariffs, interest-rate cycles, and election-year fiscal debates, 2025 was certainly a challenge. This year, many firms will re-enter the market and hit the ground running with greater conviction, supported by stronger diligence, scenario modeling, and operational planning. A few tactics include doubling down on operational risk management at the outset; leveraging advanced technologies to improve transparency and accuracy, specifically in terms of finance, tax, and regulatory compliance; and diversifying portfolios across sectors, geographies, and business models.

In 2026, deal volume and value will appreciate. This prediction is based on declining borrowing costs and uncertainty around tariffs declining. Leading the acceleration are mega funds and middle-market managers with larger funds driving growth in deal value. But strategic buyers will also play a defining role in this escalation. According to a survey by BDO, 43 percent of fund managers say most competition for deals will come from strategic acquirers. Here’s why: Their ability to pay higher prices, driven by operational synergies and stronger balance sheets, will intensify pressure on PE funds on the buy side. Consequently, this creates more favorable exit conditions for PE funds looking to sell assets.

PE is betting on AI, big-time. Firms are making sizable investments in industries that are the backbone of AI transformation, including data centers, energy producersand network hardware suppliers. While these categories are capital-intensive and tap into measurable, long-term market demand, PE’s interest in AI expands beyond sector strategy and deal sourcing, as firms are looking at how to leverage AI not only for fund and portfolio company management, but also the investment life cycle (due diligence, fraud detection, standardized reporting), which improves the way decisions are made. Good news for investors, indeed.

Valuations will remain high for top-tier deals. Primarily, this isdriven by firms willing to pay premiums for companies considered resilient and/or strategically essential. Common features these businesses share are predictable cash flows, defensible business models, and a position in sectors with secular growth, such as AI, infrastructure, or technology-driven industries. Why? They’re better equipped to withstand macroeconomic volatility compared with other kinds of investments.

Lessons were learned from the 2021 buying frenzy. This eventful year was comprised of abundant liquidity, low interest rates, and pent-up post-pandemic demand, which led to aggressive dealmaking. Now that macro-conditions have shifted, those 2021 deals are struggling to perform. This year, fund managers are expected to learn from the dynamics of years past and recalibrate their strategies, looking more closely at valuations and focusing on fewer but high-quality deals. This builds greater flexibility for exit planning, whether it’s traditional sponsor-to-sponsor, strategic sales, or IPO pathways. For the private equity investors, 2026 might well supersede the revenue-rich dynamic of 2021.

These are a few of the variables that will affect the private equity market. That said, success will most likely depend less on timing markets and more on being operationally prepared to seize the lucrative, high-quality opportunities when they arise.

Sources

https://www.bdo.com/insights/industries/private-equity/2026-private-equity-predictions#:~:text=In%202026%2C%20many%20firms%20will,elevated%20relative%20to%20historical%20norms

Scam-Proof Guidelines for Wiring Money

6 min read

Scam-Proof Guidelines for Wiring MoneyWiring money is like sending cash: Once you’ve sent it, it’s gone. It is very difficult to retrieve – in fact, more difficult than recovering physical dollar bills.

For businesses, always call the recipient to verify ACH details before sending; this is required by law in 50 states. This law does not require calling, but if the sender’s or recipient’s email is hacked, calling will help prevent the hacker from changing ACH details in a hacked email account.

If wire fraud takes place due to a security breach, such as a hacker infiltrating your account and initiating a wire transfer, you may have protection. Reputable financial institutions will generally cover your losses in the case of a cyber attack. Recoverability is dependent, however, on whether the wire was properly authorized or unauthorized and the payment type (wire vs. ACH).  However, if you fall for a scam and initiate the wire transfer yourself, you’re probably out of luck.

Another scenario is having an incorrect address or account number in your wire transfer instructions. For example, say you want to send a large sum of money to your lender to pay off your mortgage. It’s a good idea to contact the institution directly (by phone or in person) and ask them to tell you where to send your wire transfer to match it with the printed instructions you may have received. Always proofread the wire transfer instructions carefully.

Should you accidentally transpose the numbers in a wire transfer, you could lose that money. If you contact your bank immediately to report the error, they may be able to recall the funds. However, if the recipient has already accepted the transfer, particularly if they have transferred the money elsewhere, it is almost impossible to recover.

Remember, wire transfers settle quickly and are typically irreversible once accepted. That is why they are one of the prime targets for cybercriminals. If you are unfamiliar with the person or institution where you are wiring money, research them first to confirm their identity and see if there are any complaints or red flags associated with the entity. If you had no reason to initiate the wire transfer before being contacted, you should be especially suspicious.  Be extremely skeptical of unsolicited urgent requests, especially when instructions change, or you can’t verify independently

The following are some common scams perpetuated today.

Bank Fraud

Your bank or investment firm calls you directly to alert you to a possible scam; someone is attempting to hack into your account and steal your money. They may even verify your account with details they have obtained – such as your name, address, and perhaps even your Social Security and account numbers. Rather than an affirmation of their legitimacy, this should be a red flag. First of all, no legitimate financial institution or government agency would relay this information over the phone. Second, a fraudster may tell you the best way to block the potential hack is to open a new account and transfer your money there. This is a red flag. Third, the scammer may insist that time is of the essence – you must act immediately before your money is stolen.

If you get a call like this, hang up and either call (the number on your statement or debit/credit card) or visit your local bank branch to inquire about the call. Chances are good that the bank will confirm there is no breach and that your account is safe.

Dating Apps

Dating apps are the 21st-century version of blind dates. According to Statista, more than 60 million Americans used dating apps in 2024. Instead of meeting organically in a bar or at a party, users peruse dating profiles to find a prospective mate. Unfortunately, these platforms are rife with money-seeking predators – and they can be very patient.

Many online relationship predators interact for months before the scammer mentions that he or she is having money trouble. They may even wait for their paramour to offer money to help them out. Remember that the red flags apply – you didn’t initiate the need. The need for funds should never be immediate. You should research and verify the legitimacy of any person who would agree to accept money from someone they met online. Remember, once you send money, you may never hear from that person again. Or they may continue to interact, but you could get another request for funds a little further down the road.

One way to detect a dating app fraudster is by noticing clues that they are not who they claim to be. For example, many scammers live in other countries. They may not be familiar with common local interests in the town or city where they say they are from. Or, you may notice unusual grammar or phrasing in their communications, indicating English is not their native language.

The Friend or Relative Scam

One of the most heart-rending scams is when a person – often a senior citizen – is asked by a struggling friend or family member to send money. For example, a grandchild away at college who says she doesn’t want her parents to know she needs money. Pulling at the heartstrings, paired with aging cognitive decline, is a recipe for wire transfer fraud. It’s a good idea to establish a “family password” with which to verify proof of identity for suspicious scenarios. Also, call the family member or friend back at a known number for verification before sending money.

Investment Scam

The too-good-to-be-true investment opportunity is an old scam still used today, often to entice the purchase of cryptocurrency with cash. As with all these potential scams, do your due diligence and confirm the legitimacy of the receiver and their details.

The best way to prevent money wire fraud is to stay up to date with the latest scams and trust your gut: Do not act until you have thoroughly researched the details.

Completing FY2026 Budget Appropriations, Protecting Trafficked Victims, and Vetoing Special Interest Projects

3 min read

HR 6938Commerce, Justice, Science; Energy and Water Development; and Interior and Environment Appropriations Act, 2026 (HR 6938) – This Act is one of the remaining budget bills to fund the government through Sept. 30, 2026. It includes funding for several agencies, including the Department of Commerce, the Department of Justice, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Department of Energy, and the Environmental Protection Agency. The bill was introduced by Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK) on Jan. 6. It passed in the House on Jan. 8, the Senate on Jan. 15, and was signed into law on Jan. 23.

Financial Services and General Government and National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2026 (HR 7006) – This Act was introduced by Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK) on Jan. 12. Yet another fiscal year 2026 budget bill, it authorizes investments to support economic growth and entrepreneurship, safeguard American security and authorize funding for the Executive and Judicial branches. The bill passed in the House on Jan. 14 and is awaiting passage in the Senate.

Trafficking Survivors Relief Act (HR 4323) – The purpose of this bipartisan bill is to help stop a vicious cycle that makes human trafficking victims vulnerable to further exploitation. The Act enables survivors to file motions to vacate non-violent convictions and purge arrest records for certain criminal offenses committed as a direct result of being trafficked. The current iteration of the bill was introduced by Rep. Russell Fry (R-SC) on July 19, 2025. It cleared the House on Dec. 1, the Senate on Dec. 18, and was signed into law on Jan. 23.

Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit Act (HR 131) – Introduced by Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) on January 3, 2025, this bill is related to a Colorado water infrastructure pipeline currently under construction, designed to port clean water from the Pueblo Reservoir to 50,000 Coloradans in the local area. The bill would have extended the repayment period for local municipalities and removed interest payments. The bill passed in the House on July 21 and in the Senate on Dec. 16; it was vetoed by the President on Dec. 31, 2025.

Miccosukee Reserved Area Amendments Act (HR 504) – This bill would have authorized the expansion of the Miccosukee Reserved Area to include a portion of Everglades National Park in Florida. In recent years, the area, known as Osceola Camp, has been prone to flooding, and this bill would have authorized safeguard measures to protect structures within the camp. The bill was introduced on Jan. 16, 2025, by Rep. Carlos Gimenez (R-FL). It passed in the House on July 14 and in the Senate on Dec. 11, 2025. The bill was vetoed by the President on Dec. 30 and failed an override vote in the House on Jan. 8.

Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act of 2025 (S 222) – This Act amends the existing National School Lunch Act to allow schools participating in the federal school lunch program to serve whole milk. It was introduced by Sen. Roger Marshall (R-KS) on Jan. 23, 2025, passed the Senate on Nov. 20, the House on Dec. 15 and was signed into law by the President on Jan. 14.

Accounting Considerations for Senior Debt

3 min read

What is Senior DebtAlso known as a Senior Note, Senior Debt consists of a company’s outstanding loans collateralized by the business’ assets. As the name implies, Senior Debt holders are the first claimants of the business’ cash flows and/or liquidated assets if that business defaults on its debt and files for bankruptcy. Subordinated or junior debt in the form of Preferred and Common Equity shares has claims to any subsequent assets – but only after Senior Debt holders are made whole. 

Originating via financial institutions, revolving credit facilities, and Senior Term Debt are the primary ways companies obtain financing. Whether the debt is funded by another business, an individual backer, or a traditional bank lender, if the borrowing company files for bankruptcy and liquidates its assets, Senior Bondholders are first in line for available repayment.

Senior Debt Characteristics and Structure

Much like any type of borrowed money, each tier has different interest rates and amortization schedules, including Senior Debt. Senior Debt issuers put terms in the debenture restricting companies from issuing additional, lower-tier debt. Debt issuers often require borrowers to maintain specific credit profiles, which are determined by financing ratios such as interest service coverage and debt service coverage.

Other stipulations may include requiring the borrower to maintain or refrain from business activities beyond their essential commercial functions. If the stipulations are flouted, the lender may retract, modify the borrowing terms, or mandate immediate payment of accrued interest and principal. It’s important to note that since Senior Debt has more restrictive terms, interest rates are generally lower compared to unsecured/less senior debt.

When it comes to unsecured debt, primarily junior or subordinated debt, although it’s not collateralized, the terms stipulate that the lender(s) have a claim to the company’s assets in case of bankruptcy/liquidation and are next in line to get paid off from the assets of the company, minus any pledged assets for secured debt debtholders.

Accounting Considerations

The first step to account for Senior Debt is to break it up into short-term and long-term debt (within 12 months and longer than 12 months). For example, long-term debt, which turns into long-term liabilities from short-term obligations, like accounts payable, is recorded on the company’s balance sheet. This generally happens when the short-term obligations are re-classified into a lengthier note.

If a business obtains a $10 million bank loan, secured by their machinery and other assets, for a new product line, with a 7 percent interest rate for 15 years, along with the business assets, liabilities and shareholders’ equity, the long-term portion would be reported on the company’s balance sheet. It would be recorded as a liability on the balance sheet, where any other long-term debt and bonds issued or borrowed by the company.

The income statement would document its loan interest. It’s calculated by taking the principal multiplied by the interest rate.  Once the interest is determined, it’s classified as an expense on the income statement, lowering the company’s net income and profits. As the loan’s principal is paid over the 15-year loan life, a set amount of the loan principal is repaid each year.

Conclusion

Senior Debt can be an effective way to obtain funding, but businesses must understand how funding agreements work and how to properly account for them.

 

What Families Need to Know About the New Trump Accounts

4 min read

What are Trump Accounts?American parents now have access to a completely new savings tool designed to give children a financial foundation for the future. Established through The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, these accounts carry the name of the current president and come with a unique set of rules that the IRS has just begun to clarify.

Who Can Open One?

Any minor holding a Social Security number who has not yet turned 18 by Dec. 31 of the current year meets the eligibility criteria. Getting started requires an authorized adult, typically a parent or legal guardian, to submit an application to the Treasury Department. Once processed, the government establishes the child’s account.

Free Money for Newborns

Families welcoming babies during a specific four-year window stand to benefit the most. American citizens born anytime from the start of 2025 through the end of 2028 qualify for a $1,000 federal deposit through a pilot initiative. This starter contribution sits outside all annual limits, meaning it will not reduce how much others can add later.

Billionaire Backing Adds More

Tech titan Michael Dell and his wife, Susan, have pledged $6.25 billion to boost these accounts further. Their generosity will provide an extra $250 to the first 25 million children meeting specific requirements. Kids must be no older than 10 and reside in areas where the median household income is under $150,000. Dell, who runs Dell Technologies as chairman and CEO, ranks 10th among America’s wealthiest individuals with a fortune estimated at $148.9 billion.

How Much Can Be Contributed Each Year?

The law caps annual contributions at $5,000, though this figure will rise with inflation over time. Grandparents, aunts, uncles, family friends, and parents can all put money in, but every dollar from these sources counts toward that yearly ceiling. Exceed the limit, and you will need to pull the excess back out.

Workplace benefits offer another channel. Companies can deposit as much as $2,500 annually into accounts belonging to workers or their children. While this money does apply toward the $5,000 threshold, employees will not owe taxes on these contributions.

Charitable organizations and government bodies at various levels have permission to fund these accounts through something called qualified general contributions. Unlike personal or employer deposits, this category of funding exists completely outside the annual cap.

Keep in mind that money coming from family members or friends provides no tax break. These contributions use after-tax dollars. Also worth noting: the earliest anyone can start funding these accounts is Independence Day 2026.

Strict Rules Govern Investments

Congress placed tight restrictions on where this money can go. Only mutual funds and ETFs tracking American stock market indexes qualify. These funds cannot employ any leverage strategies, and their annual expense ratios must not exceed one-tenth of one percent.

Accessing the Funds

Until reaching adulthood, account holders face severe limits on touching their money. The rules permit withdrawals only in narrow circumstances: transferring everything to a different Trump Account, correcting over-contributions, or closing the account following the child’s death.

Everything changes at 18. From that birthday forward, the account essentially transforms into something resembling a traditional IRA with comparable guidelines around distributions and taxation.

Filing Requirements

Establishing one of these accounts means completing Form 4547, which the IRS titled Trump Account Election. This document accompanies your annual 1040 filing and handles both account setup and pilot program enrollment. The form number itself contains a nod to history, combining 45 and 47 to reflect Trump’s elections as both the 45th and 47th commander in chief.

Conclusion and Official Resources

This new savings tool gives families an innovative avenue to save. Taxpayers seeking detailed information can review Notice 2025-68, which the IRS published to address questions about account creation, investment options, contribution types, distribution rules, and reporting obligations. Full regulations remain in development, with proposed rules expected before final versions emerge following public input. The government maintains a dedicated portal at trumpaccounts.gov for ongoing updates.

Improving Military Benefits, Relaxing Energy Regulations and Increasing Aviation Regulations

3 min read

Improving Military BenefitsVeterans’ Compensation Cost-of-Living Adjustment Act of 2025 (S 2392) – This Act was introduced by Sen. Jerry Moran (R-KS) on July 23. It passed in the Senate on Nov. 9, the House on Nov. 17, and was signed into law on Nov. 25. The purpose of this bill is to increase rates of compensation for veterans with service-connected disabilities, as well as the rates of dependency and indemnity compensation for the survivors of certain disabled veterans. The rate hikes became effective on Dec. 1.

Fairness for Servicemembers and their Families Act of 2025 (HR 970) – This bipartisan Act was introduced on Feb. 4 by Rep. Marilyn Strickland (D-WA). It authorizes increases to servicemember and veteran life insurance packages in order to account for inflation and higher costs of living. It passed in the House on April 7, in the Senate on Nov. 20, and was enacted by the President on Dec. 12.

Veteran Fraud Reimbursement Act of 2025 (HR 1912) – The Veterans Benefits Administration has experienced negligence and fraud that have prevented many veterans from receiving benefits. In the past, the case-by-case system of investigation into misuse led to further delays; in some cases, veterans passed away before ever receiving remuneration. The purpose of this bill is to allow the Veterans Benefits Administration to reimburse victims of fraud via a streamlined process, so that the investigation occurs after the affected veterans have been reimbursed. The bill, which was introduced by Rep. Gerald Connolly (D-VA) on March 6, passed in the House on May 5, in the Senate on Nov. 20, and was signed into law on Dec. 12.

SPEED Act (HR 4776) – The purpose of this bipartisan legislation is to streamline the existing environmental analysis requirements for energy projects (e.g., offshore drilling, mining, pipeline development). Provisions include reducing litigation challenges to a 150-day challenge window, developing standardized federal action criteria, and defining procedural deadlines. The Act was introduced by Rep. Bruce Westerman (R-AR) on July 25 and passed in the House on Dec. 18. Its fate currently rests with the Senate.

ROTOR Act (S 2503) – Prompted by multiple incidents this year, including military aircraft such as the Washington, D.C., helicopter collision, this bipartisan bill seeks to improve aviation safety and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) oversight. The legislation would specifically require all aircraft to incorporate ADS-B technology, which displays nearby planes and weather data on cockpit screens. The legislation was introduced by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) on July 29. It passed in the Senate on Dec. 17 and awaits consideration by the House.

Lower Health Care Premiums for All Americans Act (HR 6703) – Sponsored by Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-IA), this healthcare bill proposes expanding association health plans, increasing transparency requirements for pharmacy benefit managers, and funding some cost-sharing reductions for qualifying Health Insurance Marketplace enrollees. It does not include extending the enhanced premium tax credits that expired on Dec. 31, 2025. The bill was introduced on Dec. 15 and passed in the House on Dec. 17. Its fate now lies with the Senate.

Accounting for Net Charge Offs

3 min read

Accounting for Net Charge OffsWhen it comes it understanding a net charge-off (NCO), it’s the difference between any recovery of delinquent debt and gross charge-offs a business sees in a defined accounting time frame. NCOs are debts a company projects with a low likelihood of being collected. It can happen when a customer stops paying outstanding invoices or sees a decline in their credit rating.  

The first step considers it as a gross charge-off; if any amount is recovered, it’s subtracted to arrive at net charge-offs. If businesses can recover a percentage of what’s been charged off, the recovered monies can be net against the gross charge-offs to realize net charge-offs. A business’ loan loss provision is lowered by the net charge-off amount at the end of the accounting time frame and then refilled for the next accounting time frame based on new estimates for loan losses. This is part of a business’ provision for credit losses (PCL) that projects a certain percentage of accounts unable to be collected.

Accounting in Detail

The following formula calculates net charge-offs (NCO). This assumes a gross charge-off booking of 6 percent of all outstanding loans, with 1 percent ultimately being recovered during a particular accounting time frame.

Net Charge-Offs = Gross Charge-Offs – Amount of Recovered Debt

= 6 percent – 1 percent = 5 percent

Once the figure is calculated, the 1 percent collected adjusts the loan loss provision in the accounting statements.

Financial Institutions Illustrate Accounting Considerations

Banks’ business models and financials demonstrate their ability to pay their depositors competitive interest rates while also being able to make loans. Since banks earn profits via net interest margin, earning a spread between what banks pay depositors on interest rates and what borrowers are charged on loans, the spread is integral to measuring profitability. To generate the total value of a bank’s balance sheet, it’s imperative for banks to estimate and project their charge-offs as accurately as possible.

Financial institutions determine credit loss provisions by analyzing their balance sheets and the level of risk represented by outstanding loans. They look at the ratio of loan losses to overall losses, which is their net charge-off rate. The net charge-off rate is used to evaluate a loan’s book quality against other banks.

How Different Risks Impact Net Charge-Off Levels

Banks that have different loan mixes will see different risk and reward payoffs. If one bank offers primarily secured loans, while it may have lower net interest margins, it will also have lower charge-offs because the collateral backing them is less risky overall. This is compared to other lenders that have a higher level of unsecured loans, such as credit cards and commercial loans. This scenario, in the case of riskier loans, may result in higher net interest margins, but also greater potential for higher losses.

Journal Entry Examples

The following journal entries illustrate how to account for bad debts. Using the direct write-off method, when debt collection efforts have been exhausted, bad debts are recorded as follows:

Expenses for bad debt: Debit $750

Accounts Receivable: Credit $750

If, however, the business recovers anything from the customer’s outstanding invoices, the following journal entries would be added if $200 were received:

Cash: Debit $200

Accounts Receivable: Credit $200

Conclusion

While this is primarily for early-stage companies with a low percentage of credit sales, it illustrates how businesses can update their books when projecting their numbers to account for net charge-offs.

What Seniors Actually Got in the Latest Tax Bill

4 min read

What Seniors Actually Got in the Latest Tax Bill, SS CreditCampaign messaging would have you believe retirees just scored a major victory. The talking point is everywhere: Social Security benefits are now tax-free. But anyone who reads the One Big Beautiful Bill Act will discover something different. The legislation contains nothing that removes Social Security from federal taxation. Zero provisions. The tax structure that has applied to benefits for over four decades remains fully intact.

So, what did pass? A new deduction aimed at older Americans. And through some rhetorical gymnastics, that deduction is being sold as something it fundamentally is not.

A Deduction Is Not an Exemption

The OBBBA creates an additional deduction exclusively for seniors. Single filers get $6,000 while married couples receive $12,000. This stacks on top of what they already claim through the standard deduction, lowering their overall taxable income.

For retirees whose financial situation falls in a particular range, this extra write-off might be enough to cancel out whatever portion of their Social Security would normally face taxation. But here’s the catch: the deduction applies to all income equally. It doesn’t single out retirement benefits for protection. If your earnings came entirely from investments or a workplace pension, the math would work identically.

Decades of Unchanged Rules

Federal taxation of Social Security benefits dates back to 1983. President Reagan signed that change with support from both parties, making up to half of benefits taxable for seniors with higher earnings. Then in 1993, Congress and President Clinton pushed the ceiling higher. Under current rules, as much as 85 percent of benefits can count toward taxable income for upper-income retirees.

None of that changed with this bill.

The thresholds determining who pays what have remained frozen since the Clinton era. Single filers earning under $25,000 and couples under $32,000 owe nothing on their benefits. Those in the middle tier face taxes on up to half. And couples bringing in more than $44,000 can see 85 percent of their Social Security added to their taxable total.

Because these cutoffs have never adjusted for inflation, more retirees get pulled into taxable categories every single year. The OBBBA leaves this problem completely unaddressed.

Looking at the Administration’s Own Math

Treasury Department calculations highlighted by the White House reveal how limited the benefit truly is. Picture a single retiree receiving $40,000 annually from Social Security alongside another $40,000 from retirement accounts like an IRA or 401(k). Current law would put their 2026 tax bill at $7,190. Under the new legislation, the amount drops to $5,685, a reduction of roughly $1,500. The senior deduction accounts for approximately $900 of those savings.

Helpful? Sure. But this person still owes thousands in federal taxes. Their Social Security benefits remain part of the calculation. The deduction simply chips away at overall liability without treating retirement benefits any differently than other income sources.

Temporary Relief with Built-In Limits

Unlike corporate tax provisions and cuts benefiting wealthy taxpayers, which received permanent status in the bill, the senior deduction disappears after 2028. It was written with an expiration date from the start.

Income limits further narrow who benefits. Single filers with earnings above $75,000 and married couples exceeding $150,000 see the deduction phase-out entirely. Ironically, these higher-earning retirees facing the steepest Social Security taxation are exactly the ones shut out from this supposed fix.

Conclusion and Why This Framing Succeeds

Announcing a supplemental deduction for older taxpayers generates little excitement. Declaring that Social Security taxation has ended makes waves. Political strategists understand that most people absorb information through headlines rather than legislative analysis. Few voters examine IRS guidance or compare statutory language.

The outcome is clever stagecraft masquerading as meaningful reform. Benefits remain taxable under the same formulas established decades ago. Inflation continues to drag more retirees across taxation thresholds, and this temporary, income-restricted deduction is merely wrapped in revolutionary packaging.